@article {2007,
	title = {Investigating the Dynamics of FLOSS Development Teams (Poster)},
	year = {2007},
	note = {SD 2007 poster - Full Adobe PDF
2007 HSD PI{\textquoteright}s conference poster reporting on the grant project work to date in a full Adobe PDF file.

HSD 2007 poster - Small PDF
HSD 2007 conference grant progress reporting poster in a smaller PDF file.
},
	attachments = {https://floss.syr.edu/sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/HSDposter_8.ai_.pdf , https://floss.syr.edu/sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/HSDposter_8.pdf},
	author = {Li, Na and Li, Qing and Kangning Wei and Heckman, Robert and Eseryel, U. Yeliz and Liddy, Elizabeth D. and James Howison and Kevin Crowston and Allen, Eileen E. and Scialdone, Michael J. and Inoue, Keisuke and Harwell, Sarah and Rowe, Steven and McCracken, Nancy and Wiggins, Andrea}
}
@article {Crowston:2006,
	title = {Information systems success in Free and Open Source Software development: Theory and measures},
	journal = {Software Process{\textendash}Improvement and Practice},
	volume = {11},
	number = {2},
	year = {2006},
	pages = {123{\textendash}148},
	abstract = {Information systems success is one of the most widely used dependent variables in information systems (IS) research, but research on Free/Libre and Open Source software (FLOSS) often fails to appropriately conceptualize this important concept. In this paper, we reconsider what success means within a FLOSS context. We first review existing models of IS success and success variables used in FLOSS research and assess them for their usefulness, practicality and fit to the FLOSS context. Then, drawing on a theoretical model of group effectiveness in the FLOSS development process, as well as an online discussion group with developers, we present additional concepts that are central to an appropriate understanding of success for FLOSS. 
In order to examine the practicality and validity of this conceptual scheme, the second half of our paper presents an empirical study that demonstrates its operationalization of the chosen measures and assesses their internal validity. We use data from SourceForge to measure the project{\textquoteright}s effectiveness in team building, the speed of the project at responding to bug reports and the project{\textquoteright}s popularity. We conclude by discussing the implications of this study for our proposed extension of IS success in the context of FLOSS development and highlight future directions for research.},
	keywords = {FLOSS, Success},
	doi = {10.1002/spip.259},
	attachments = {https://floss.syr.edu/sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/InformationSystemsSuccessInFree.pdf},
	author = {Kevin Crowston and James Howison and Annabi, Hala}
}
@article {2006,
	title = {Investigating the Dynamics of FLOSS Development Teams (Poster)},
	year = {2006},
	note = {Poster describing the current state of the project for the HSD Principal Investigators{\textquoteright} conference, 14-15 September 2006, Washington DC.},
	attachments = {https://floss.syr.edu/sites/crowston.syr.edu/files/hsd2006poster.pdf},
	author = {Li, Qing and Kangning Wei and Heckman, Robert and Eseryel, U. Yeliz and Liddy, Elizabeth D. and James Howison and Kevin Crowston and Allen, Eileen E. and Inoue, Keisuke and Harwell, Sarah and Rowe, Steven and McCracken, Nancy}
}
